What Peace Means to Armenia, Beyond Military Conflict
How should we define peace?
An opinion piece examines how different parties define peace in the Armenia-Azerbaijan conflict, particularly following recent diplomatic developments. The article argues that while the U.S. government may define peace narrowly as the absence of military aggression—serving American geopolitical interests in countering Russian influence—Armenians rightly expect a broader definition that ensures security and economic opportunity.
The piece emphasizes that peace should be defined by those most affected, particularly Armenia, which has endured blockades for over 30 years and significant human and territorial losses. Both American and Armenian voters prioritize security and economic stability, the article notes, yet Armenia's security concerns differ substantially given its regional isolation. The author suggests Armenia retains leverage in ongoing negotiations and should emerge from any settlement with dignity and hope for economic development.
